Whistleblowing incident on YouTube in 2020 - Revision history

Lumibd: Blanked the page

2020-09-10T13:50:20Z

Blanked the page

JuJakJakJuJakJak at 17:08, 4 August 2020

2020-08-04T17:08:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:08, 4 August 2020
Line 5:		Line 5:
	A controversial case in which YouTubers [[Cham PD]] raised on a live broadcast turned out to be true.		A controversial case in which YouTubers [[Cham PD]] raised on a live broadcast turned out to be true.

	Advertisements using YouTube, Instagram, etc. must be recorded on the video whether they are advertised or sponsored in accordance with the revised [http://www.law.go.kr/ Administrative Rules/Recommendations, Guarantee, etc./Advertisement Guidelines\|Advertisement Review Guidelines] from September 1, 2020. As it is the first system to be implemented by [Fair Trade Commission], it will be a big deal if we do an "unclear commercial broadcast" called back-door advertising as it is now.		Advertisements using YouTube, Instagram, etc. must be recorded on the video whether they are advertised or sponsored in accordance with the revised [http://www.law.go.kr/ Administrative Rules/Recommendations, Guarantee, etc./[[Advertisement Guidelines\|Advertisement Review Guidelines]] from September 1, 2020. As it is the first system to be implemented by [Fair Trade Commission], it will be a big deal if we do an "unclear commercial broadcast" called back-door advertising as it is now.
	Advertisements using YouTube, Instagram, etc. must be recorded on the video whether they are advertised or sponsored in accordance with the revised [http://www.law.go.kr/ Administrative Rules/Recommendations, Guarantee, etc./Advertisement Guidelines\|Advertisement Review Guidelines] from September 1, 2020. As it is the first system to be implemented by [Fair Trade Commission], it can be a big deal if you do an "unclear advertisement" called back-door advertisement like now.		Advertisements using YouTube, Instagram, etc. must be recorded on the video whether they are advertised or sponsored in accordance with the revised [http://www.law.go.kr/ Administrative Rules/Recommendations, Guarantee, etc./[[Advertisement Guidelines\|Advertisement Review Guidelines]] from September 1, 2020. As it is the first system to be implemented by [Fair Trade Commission], it can be a big deal if you do an "unclear advertisement" called back-door advertisement like now.
	> YouTube should have a title such as "[Advertise] OO honest review" on the video so that consumers can clearly distinguish it. Subtitles such as "sponsored" are also needed at the beginning and end. In order to make it easier for consumers who only see part of the video, the advertisement should be repeatedly displayed every five minutes. In addition, while the corresponding part of the advertisement is played in the video, banners such as "paid advertisements" should be attached so that viewers can confirm that it is an advertisement.		> YouTube should have a title such as "[Advertise] OO honest review" on the video so that consumers can clearly distinguish it. Subtitles such as "sponsored" are also needed at the beginning and end. In order to make it easier for consumers who only see part of the video, the advertisement should be repeatedly displayed every five minutes. In addition, while the corresponding part of the advertisement is played in the video, banners such as "paid advertisements" should be attached so that viewers can confirm that it is an advertisement.
	>----		>----
Line 31:		Line 31:
	There is no further comment on the statement, "[[Dottie]] is trying to sell [[Sandbox Network]]." The apology alone says Dottie seems to have shot a superchat to stop the back ad YouTuber from mentioning it, but in fact, Cham PD is trying to sell a sandbox, which Dotti is only refuting as a superchat.		There is no further comment on the statement, "[[Dottie]] is trying to sell [[Sandbox Network]]." The apology alone says Dottie seems to have shot a superchat to stop the back ad YouTuber from mentioning it, but in fact, Cham PD is trying to sell a sandbox, which Dotti is only refuting as a superchat.

	When it comes to erasing the replay video, which he boasted never to delete, he said it was just a mistake, which is also somewhat questionable. At least if it was a real mistake, it should be explained through what process it went through. However, it is said that they have sent a request for restoration to YouTube to restore it. Along with these ambiguous attitudes, as I have reminded you, there have been many responses from all the communities that the Korean YouTuber's board seems completely unreliable, such as saying that the Korean YouTuber's board is dirty and mentioning an unspecified number of them, but in less than a day, [Tzu Yang] and [Moon Bok-hee] apologize for failing. But apart from this, there is a steady stream of talk about [Dottie] and [Kong Hyuk-joon] being sarcastic[https://m.fmkorea.com/best/3019971148\|a broadcasting attitude].		When it comes to erasing the replay video, which he boasted never to delete, he said it was just a mistake, which is also somewhat questionable. At least if it was a real mistake, it should be explained through what process it went through. However, it is said that they have sent a request for restoration to YouTube to restore it. Along with these ambiguous attitudes, as I have reminded you, there have been many responses from all the communities that the Korean YouTuber's board seems completely unreliable, such as saying that the Korean YouTuber's board is dirty and mentioning an unspecified number of them, but in less than a day, [[Tzu Yang]] and [[Moon Bok-hee]] apologize for failing. But apart from this, there is a steady stream of talk about [[Dottie]] and [[Kong Hyuk-joon]] being sarcastic[https://m.fmkorea.com/best/3019971148\|a broadcasting attitude].

	=== The reaction of the shot YouTubers ===		=== The reaction of the shot YouTubers ===

JuJakJakJuJakJak at 17:06, 4 August 2020

2020-08-04T17:06:08Z

JuJakJakJuJakJak: /* Other Internet broadcasters' responses */

2020-08-04T17:01:03Z

Other Internet broadcasters' responses

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:01, 4 August 2020
Line 396:		Line 396:

	== Other Internet broadcasters' responses ==		== Other Internet broadcasters' responses ==
	* On July 27, [Cham PD] suspended his activities due to controversy over his back-up ads, and [Cham PD] who was close to [Cham PD] and was a crew member also made his position known through related videos. [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?]v=IoFkzPflRPc&t\|Entrance][* Notify my situation as well.]		* On July 27, [[Cham PD]] suspended his activities due to controversy over his back-up ads, and [[Cham PD]] who was close to [[Cham PD]] and was a crew member also made his position known through related videos. [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?]v=IoFkzPflRPc&t\|Entrance][* Notify my situation as well.]
	* YouTuber [Hongsound] on August 1st also reported the status of behind-the-scenes ads of YouTubers [[https://youtu].be/cLA3r-z07J8\|exploited.]		* YouTuber [[Hongsound]] on August 1st also reported the status of behind-the-scenes ads of YouTubers [[https://youtu].be/cLA3r-z07J8\|exploited.]
	* In the case of YouTuber [[Panny Bottle], after the incident broke out, he wrote down the list he advertised and posted it on [https://www.youtube.com/post/UgwY9kOFxT3S4OsPkU14AaABCQ\|Community].		* In the case of YouTuber [[Panny Bottle], after the incident broke out, he wrote down the list he advertised and posted it on [https://www.youtube.com/post/UgwY9kOFxT3S4OsPkU14AaABCQ\|Community].
	* Professional gamer [[Bae Jae-min \| Knee] asked subscribers through [https://www.youtube.com/post/UgxzD8C99bnYPGDJdWp4AaABCQ\|community] if there was anything wrong with his video due to the lack of light on YouTube.		* Professional gamer [[Bae Jae-min \| Knee]] asked subscribers through [https://www.youtube.com/post/UgxzD8C99bnYPGDJdWp4AaABCQ\|community] if there was anything wrong with his video due to the lack of light on YouTube.
	* Streamer [[Pung Wol-ryang] clearly stated that all games being promoted are advertisements in live and YouTube videos, and in case of YouTube paid boxes, the videos uploaded from late last year after the law revision was announced, but the videos from a long time ago may not have been set up, so we will check them out. As for the back advertisement, the company said that in the case of Steam Indie games, which are frequently played by Pungwol-ryang, the promotion price is not appropriate and the promotion is not coming in.		* Streamer [[Pung Wol-ryang]] clearly stated that all games being promoted are advertisements in live and YouTube videos, and in case of YouTube paid boxes, the videos uploaded from late last year after the law revision was announced, but the videos from a long time ago may not have been set up, so we will check them out. As for the back advertisement, the company said that in the case of Steam Indie games, which are frequently played by Pungwol-ryang, the promotion price is not appropriate and the promotion is not coming in.
	* Streamer [[Han Dong-sook] made clear on the promotional games and said he would have forced the recent allegations against Maple if there was a backdoor advertisement.		* Streamer [[Han Dong-sook]] made clear on the promotional games and said he would have forced the recent allegations against Maple if there was a backdoor advertisement.
	* Streamer [[Ta-Hyun-Ni] said that there were times when he didn't get an advertisement even though he worked hard on the related game broadcast, and on YouTube he didn't know about the paid box, but the editors checked it on their own.		* Streamer [[Ta-Hyun-Ni]] said that there were times when he didn't get an advertisement even though he worked hard on the related game broadcast, and on YouTube he didn't know about the paid box, but the editors checked it on their own.
	[A footnote]		[[A footnote]]

	[[Category:2020/Accident]][[Category: Internet Broadcasting Incident in Korea]][[Category: Internet Broadcasting Incident]]		[[Category:2020/Accident]][[Category: Internet Broadcasting Incident in Korea]][[Category: Internet Broadcasting Incident]]

JuJakJakJuJakJak at 17:00, 4 August 2020

2020-08-04T17:00:27Z

Show changes

JuJakJakJuJakJak at 16:57, 4 August 2020

2020-08-04T16:57:56Z

Show changes

JuJakJakJuJakJak at 16:53, 4 August 2020

2020-08-04T16:53:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:53, 4 August 2020
Line 2:		Line 2:

	source: [https://namu.wiki/w/2020%EB%85%84%20%EC%9C%A0%ED%8A%9C%EB%B8%8C%20%EB%92%B7%EA%B4%91%EA%B3%A0%20%EB%82%B4%EB%B6%80%EA%B3%A0%EB%B0%9C%20%EC%82%AC%EA%B1%B4 link]		source: [https://namu.wiki/w/2020%EB%85%84%20%EC%9C%A0%ED%8A%9C%EB%B8%8C%20%EB%92%B7%EA%B4%91%EA%B3%A0%20%EB%82%B4%EB%B6%80%EA%B3%A0%EB%B0%9C%20%EC%82%AC%EA%B1%B4 link]

			* view at chrome, microsoft edge (chromium version 2019) and translate

	Classification 2020/ IncidentIncident of Internet broadcaster in KoreaInternet broadcasting incident		Classification 2020/ IncidentIncident of Internet broadcaster in KoreaInternet broadcasting incident

JuJakJakJuJakJak at 16:52, 4 August 2020

2020-08-04T16:52:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:52, 4 August 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Whistleblowing incident on YouTube in 2020		Whistleblowing incident on YouTube in 2020
	~~Last Modified Time~~: 2020~~-08-04 16:46:50~~
			source: [https://namu.wiki/w/2020%EB%85%84%20%EC%9C%A0%ED%8A%9C%EB%B8%8C%20%EB%92%B7%EA%B4%91%EA%B3%A0%20%EB%82%B4%EB%B6%80%EA%B3%A0%EB%B0%9C%20%EC%82%AC%EA%B1%B4 link]

	Classification 2020/ IncidentIncident of Internet broadcaster in KoreaInternet broadcasting incident		Classification 2020/ IncidentIncident of Internet broadcaster in KoreaInternet broadcasting incident

JuJakJakJuJakJak: Created page with "Whistleblowing incident on YouTube in 2020 Last Modified Time: 2020-08-04 16:46:50 Classification 2020/ IncidentIncident of Internet broadcaster in KoreaInternet broadcasting..."

2020-08-04T16:51:24Z

Created page with "Whistleblowing incident on YouTube in 2020 Last Modified Time: 2020-08-04 16:46:50 Classification 2020/ IncidentIncident of Internet broadcaster in KoreaInternet broadcasting..."

New page

Whistleblowing incident on YouTube in 2020
Last Modified Time: 2020-08-04 16:46:50

Classification 2020/ IncidentIncident of Internet broadcaster in KoreaInternet broadcasting incident
Editable document after login.
Related documents: True PD, Sandbox Network
Changes to headwords in relation to this document Discussion is ongoing. Any unilateral editing of the content under discussion may result in sanctions in accordance with applicable regulations.
caution. Describes incidents and accidents.

This document contains details and explanations of actual events and accidents .
1 . summary
2 . Detail
2.1 . Cham PD's sniper broadcast controversy
2.1.1 . Related to other YouTubers
2.1.2 . Sniper
2.2 . After sniping
2.3 . The reaction of sniper YouTubers
2.3.1 . Dotty
2.3.2 . Sangyoon
2.3.3 . Kim Na-Rum
2.3.4 . Hamji
2.3.5 . Bokhee Moon
2.3.6 . Tsu Yang
2.4 . Streamer sniped out of controversy
2.4.1 . Hyuk Joon Gong
2.5 . List of Internet broadcasters who recognized back advertising
2.5.1 . Hyeyeon Han
2.5.2 . bronco
2.5.3 . Edmer
2.6 . List of Internet broadcasters affected
2.6.1 . Tambourine
2.6.2 . Sony Show
2.6.3 . Wow
2.6.4 . Lucia
2.7 . The reaction of other Internet broadcasters
1. Outline[edit]

Yu tyubeo true PD of Willow yutyu filed in a live broadcast later ad event that the allegations are found to be true As controversy. Advertisements using YouTube, Instagram, etc. must be included in the video in accordance with the guidelines for screening and advertising regarding recommendations and guarantees

revised from September 1, 2020 . Since it is the first system implemented by the Fair Trade Commission , it is going to light up and run, so if you do “unspecified commercials” called back advertisements like this, something can happen. Advertisements using YouTube, Instagram, etc. must be included in the video in accordance with the guidelines for screening and advertising regarding recommendations and guarantees revised from September 1, 2020 . Since it is the first system implemented by the Fair Trade Commission , it is expected to light up and run, so if you do “unspecified commercials” called back advertisements like this, it can happen.
If you are a YouTube user, you should put a title such as'[Advertising] OO Candid Review' on the video so that consumers can clearly distinguish it. You also need subtitles, such as'to be supported' at the beginning and end. Advertisement notation should be repeated every 5 minutes so that consumers who only see a part of the video can easily distinguish. In addition, while the part corresponding to the advertisement is played as a video, a banner such as'paid advertisement' should be attached so that the viewer can confirm that the advertisement is an advertisement.
JoongAng Ilbo. 2020/06/30 Article
2. Details[edit]
2.1. Cham PD's sniper broadcast controversy[edit]
Hanhyeyeon true PD live broadcast of 4 August 2020 was an event ceased to provisional " Dottie should have to eat to sell the sandbox # , a pig appeared to lie in the fake macho # " by the remarks, such as going debate lost. Immediately after the remark, Dottie appeared on Champidi's broadcast and replied with Super Chat, and later revealed her cell phone number live while talking on the phone. Not surprisingly, normal communication did not occur as the number of viewers' calls came. This broadcast of Cham PD continued until dawn, and it is estimated that more than 20,000 people watched it.
2.1.1. Related to other YouTubers[edit]
Let's rebound, while viewers are mentioned gonghyeokjun at the end of a pig appeared to lie himself gonghyeokjun do not even know who the, fake guy is talk that even the ever mention noted that there is evidence that the video did it imported report a fake man is I went on to say something that didn't fit back and forth. At the request of the viewers, the evidence video was played directly, but whenever there was a problem word in a controversial remark, suddenly another word was made inaudible, and while trying to read it, the part was deliberately mentioned. Showed an attitude of avoiding. In the beginning, he said that he did not know Gong Hyuk Joon, and then he changed the words, saying, “I know Gong Hyuk Joon well, and I did not blame Gong Hyuk Joon for criticizing Gong Hyeok Joon, but seeing his attitude toward my favorite Kim Gye-Ran and talking from the viewer's point of view.” Afterwards, I wanted to admit the error, saying, "Please tell me if there is something else wrong with this." After about 30 minutes, again, "I have never blamed the performer" and "I don't remember" and made an angry comment and made viewers' anger.

Also, when asked why he shot Dottie , saying, "It seems that donating 100,000 won is deceiving me." When the viewer asked, "Why did you blame me before?"
After that, I can't remember from 3:55 am. Remarks such as "I sniped them or criticized them?"
2.1.2. Sniper[edit]
Sangyun write , steaming own , jjeuyang , haemji , munbokhui , referring to such, I immediately discard ends open mouth. DIA TV[1] , Sandbox Network , Treasure Hunter , the so MCN mention the company and the company of you to sneak your ad, and one end paid advertising both behind the collapse, own a new agency, the fact that Kim Paper Co. remarks like that Did. In fact, in the beginning, the controversy began with the criticism of Gong Hyeok-Jun rather than the criticism of Dotty, but Dotty heard the news that the manager turned off the broadcast and tried to find out what was wrong by ignoring it. As it appeared, the incident grew.
In a live broadcast, Champy continued to insist that the Korean YouTube version is very dirty, while YouTubers with 1 million to 4 million subscribers (in fact, almost all Korean YouTubers) can't avoid this charge, and how much they see and I know that you are deceiving your subscribers, all this is evidence that one is based on the fact he says. But all of these claims were made by someone who had been drunk and forgot to say a few ten minutes ago. That's why I doubt that this is true.
2.2. After sniping[edit]
After the sniping, he indulged after the coordination of the manager that it was difficult to communicate properly. And since then, he has written a long apology in his community . However, the response of the comment is very cold. It is because not only is it suspicious of the authenticity of an apology by dismissing his actions as much as the mistakes he has made, but he also showed that Gong Hyeok-jun, who suffered directly, was a specific person and avoided as much as possible.

The apologize also said, " Dotty is trying to sell the sandbox network ." There is no further mention of the remarks, but it is written that it looks like Dotty was shooting Super Chat to stop mentioning the back ad YouTuber, but in fact, the true PD said Dotty was trying to sell the sandbox. It's just that Dottie refuted it with Super Chat.

It was said that it was just a mistake when it comes to erasing the replay video, which was said to never be erased. This is also somewhat suspicious. At least, if it was a real mistake, you can explain what kind of process you made. However, it is said that a request for restoration was sent to YouTube to recover. Along with these ambiguous attitudes, as mentioned above, in the state of intoxication, where a normal accident is impossible to disclose in a broadcast where close to 10,000 people are viewed, even the Korean YouTubers are all dirty, etc. because of the attitude shown this not entirely reliable, such as that mentioned yeoteuna shop ahninya react to network the moment the majority in every community, not a day has been holding jjeuyang , munbokhui olrimyeo several yutyu willow the apology and a clarification statement such as this to be true Was revealed. However Apart from Dottie ditch gonghyeokjun one ratio for which the nunssal jjipuryeo broadcasting attitude of constantly appearing for the horse.
2.3. The reaction of sniper YouTubers[edit]
2.3.1. Dotty[edit]
As a Dottie individual, there have been no official reactions except SuperChat. However, the Sandbox Network has announced that it will respond strongly to the incident .
2.3.2. Sangyoon[edit]
I apologized to my YouTube community.

Apologies to the community[2]
2.3.3. Kim Na-Rum[edit]
There has been an entry statement in the YouTube community that acknowledges back advertising.

Apologies to the community[3]

August 3 23:00's own TV Kim own the hind ad I posted an article regarding, among the steaming own articles it posted requests the base only when more progress is a paid ad from the agency and the advertiser side from last year mentioned that.[4] This is a violation of the YouTube community line.[5] , a sandbox that they are in full compliance with the YouTube community lines Dottie mention has pointed out that false. However, if you see that Dottie mentioned as "Creators who did not know what we did with a non-exclusive contract rather than our own advertisement," Dottie is not in each YouTuber but in the sandbox network itself. It is very likely that you were talking about it. In other words, there are some differences between Dottie and Kim Na-Rum's claims.
All or part of the content of this paragraph is the r526 edition of the true PD document., Paragraph 5.2Taken from Go to previous history
2.3.4. Hamji[edit]
I apologized to my YouTube community.

Apologies to the community

Three apologies[6] , The translation was posted to the community .
Also, for the time being, there will be no profit creation and video posting, and during that time, he added that he would not be disappointed by carefully thinking about the channel direction as much as possible.
2.3.5. Bokhee Moon[edit]
Immediately after the incident, he posted a comment saying that he had never done so with his personal SNS, but the next day became more and more, and eventually, on August 3, he reversed his existing position on personal SNS and admitted that he had done a back advertisement. As it turned out. #

Bok-hee Moon's 1st entrance[7]

Bok-hee Moon's 2nd entrance door (apple)[8]

And on the 4th of August, after admitting the facts about the back advertisement, the ad mark began to appear on the videos that had not been marked. # Even though the viewers pretended to be acting deceptively even after paying the advertising fee, it seems that there is a certain level of decline in the Korean subscription level even though the foreign subscribers do not know.

The controversy is a bit controversial, but in the part of the explanation for the back advertisement, we searched for the wrong part that didn't fit the context at all because we were afraid of human attack, sexual harassment, and insult . It is only a neat apology, but it has been criticized for driving in a strange way.

Eventually, this also became controversial, so I revised the text, and again on August 4, I apologized.
Although it was an advertisement, it has never been revealed.
2. If you do not see more, there are some parts that are misleading.
3. The advertisement video was not readable.
4. I wrote the advertisement as a sponsor.
In recognition of these four errors, the article I posted yesterday seems to have been posted without accurately grasping my wrong behavior, and I am embarrassed and realized my ignorance and there is no excuse.
#
2.3.6. Tsu Yang[edit]
For more information, Tsuyang documentA 4.4 second paragraph the Please note.
17:00, jjeuyang the clarification video posted. The main point is that the production teams have revealed the contents of the Kakao talks with the companies and have thoroughly displayed all the advertisements so as not to damage Tsuyang. . However, he mentioned that there were some videos uploaded in the past that did not indicate that they were advertisements, but acknowledged some of the controversy and promised to prevent recurrence.

However, in the case of Tsuyang, the matter has already been mentioned once in the past.I have done [9] . # # From 3 minutes 15 seconds, that is, even though I have already mentioned the matter in the past, I recently uploaded an apology video again when it became controversial.

The video was quite high with 2.1 million views, and it was posted in January of this year, before the back-advertisement controversy began. It has never been controversial. "If it's an advertisement video, it's displayed." It is presumed that Charm PD sniped without knowing whether to upload such a video in January of this year.

Champid said that he did not see any intention to lie, so he acknowledged the early mistakes of the broadcast and thanked him for his difficult actions to apologize. However, there are many responses such as whether the comment has the right to evaluate the true PD apart from Ts Yang's fault. As of 8:00 PM, the comment was not seen, so it is estimated that it went down.

According to Fijial's writings, it is believed that Tsuyang's agency asked to comment. Champudi Comments

At around 9:00 pm, the production team of the Tsuyang channel posted the entry statement of the sniper sniping the Hong Sound, and it was deleted shortly thereafter. Tsuyang said that it was not a matter that had been raised in consultation with the self, and that he would express his position after finding out the police as soon as possible.
2.4. Streamer sniped out of controversy[edit]
2.4.1. Hyuk Joon Gong[edit]
For more information, Gong Hyuk Joon/Controversy and Incident DocumentsOf 15.1, paragraph a Please note.
Gonghyeokjun If such is not the advertising problem, just "pure bihogam is when beaten yiraseo.

The back-advertisement case described here is rather stiff, and he's just lost his donation.[10] I didn't get any back advertisements, rather than back advertisements, so I started a self-study gag asking someone to give me an advertisement. When the viewers raised suspicion with a joke, all the jizzlings that were originally enjoyed are mine[11] And Onahol insulted which crazy guy would advertise like that.

There was also a false article about Champid that snipered that Gong Hyuk-jun had back advertising.
2.5. List of Internet broadcasters who recognized back advertising[edit]
In addition to the characters who saw the true PD, suspicions have been raised by various Internet broadcasters in various communities. Despite the diversity of genres of YouTubers, issues focused on food and games.
2.5.1. Hyeyeon Han[edit]
For more information, Hyeyeon Han documentA 4.1 second paragraph the Please note.
2.5.2. bronco[edit]
For more information, please refer to the Bronco PPL and the video footage case document.To Please note.
2.5.3. Edmer[edit]
Recognizing the suspicion of back-advertising, the related live broadcast was conducted.
In the past 60 advertisements, 4 of them were missing advertisements.
2.6. List of Internet broadcasters affected[edit]
Mainly, it was mentioned that it was an advertisement in broadcasting, but it was revealed that the contents of the edited version were missing, or the paid box was not attached when uploading YouTube.
2.6.1. Tambourine[edit]
In the past, when the Yeomwang was horned, the Twitch headquarters revealed that it was an advertisement, but the YouTube edited video did not show that it was an advertisement because of his mistake, and he apologized.
2.6.2. Sony Show[edit]
Played Langgrissa three months ago, he announced in advance that it was a paid advertisement, but he did not attach a paid box when uploading YouTube, and he acknowledged in this process that the Sony Show himself was wrong about this. He explained that he was going to be sweet after the broadcast and explained the back advertisement.
2.6.3. Wow[edit]
Controversial video (Cat Trix)[12]

FIFA mobile video. Originally, there was no paid advertising sign, but it was added after the incident.

As such, it was often found that YouTube videos did not display paid advertisements. In response to this, I acknowledged my mistake and expressed my stance that I would display paid advertisements in the future.

In response, the viewers' group revealed that it was an advertisement on a live broadcast, but it was misunderstood that the ad of the advertisement was edited on the video.[13] He explained that he thought he would be able to recognize without displaying paid advertisements because the commonly used tensions, such as the voice and tone of the Cat Trix advertisement video, were the same as those of the advertisement.

Fans hitting the shield were asked not to hit the shield, and they said that they were wrong, and this part showed that they had no words to say, and asked them to swear more.

On the other hand, the side who views negatively about the explanation criticizes whether the subscribers' awareness and advertisement are separate issues, and can the advocate logic be the subjective part that only the fixed viewers can understand about the tension, which is the shield logic of the fans? Pointing out.

Since then, an apology was posted to the YouTube community.
2.6.4. Lucia[edit]
Immediately after the incident, suspicions were raised about the play video of the ark, and it was admitted that the advertisement was not announced through an apology. However, in the first apology, authenticity controversy arose after leaving comments such as'advertisement proposal came in during the game','thank you for visiting my YouTube', and'please come to live broadcast'. Subsequently, Lucia posted a second apology statement, and here,'I apologize for any reason because it is a paid advertisement at the end of 7 months'. I left a word. However, in the first apology statement, there was no specific explanation of the part that the advocate admitted during the game. Corresponding video

Apology Moon on Myeongil Ark video[14]
2.7. The reaction of other Internet broadcasters[edit]
Last July 27 true PD while suspended activities due to back controversial advertising, indeed PD and friendly crew doing activities who taste Commerce announced its position even through the associated image. Entrance[15]
On August 1, YouTuber's Red Sound also revealed the back advertisements of YouTubers .
In the case of Youtuber Pani Bottle , after the incident broke out, I wrote a list of advertisements and posted it on the community .
Pro Gamer knee is sure to subscribers YouTube is not bright situation would be a problem with your video community asked through.
Streamer Pungwolryang clearly stated that all the games that promoted it were advertisements in live broadcasts and YouTube videos. In the case of YouTube paid boxes, uploaded videos have been set since the end of last year after the announcement of the amendment, but the videos may not be set long ago. I said I would confirm. In the case of the back advertisement, it was said that the promotion price was not appropriate in the case of the Steam Indie game, which frequently plays Pungwol.
Streamer Han Dong-suk stated clearly that the games being promoted were clearly mentioned, and he would have been forced to do so if there were back advertisements for suspicion of the recent Maple.
Streamer Tahyoni said that even though he had been broadcasting related games, there were cases where he did not receive advertisements.
[1] Particularly, this is a member of the organization to which he belongs, and there is a possibility that problems may arise.
[2] Created on August 4, 2020, around 5 pm
[3] Created August 3, 2020
[4] Kim Na-Rum's former agency is a sandbox . In other words, the agency that requested from last year is a sandbox.
[5] If a paid advertisement is included in the video, when uploading the video, check the box that the paid advertisement is included. In this case, viewers will see a sign saying "Including paid ads" at the bottom left of the video.
[6] 1st: Apology, 2nd: English apology, 3rd: English, Chinese, Japanese apology
[7] Uploaded on August 3, 2020
[8] Uploaded around 6 AM on August 4, 2020
[9] In the case of old videos, even though they received advertisements, they did not.
[10] In fact, Gonghyeokjun tried to make a donation, but when he searched Gonghyeokjun on YouTube, the first thing that came out was an onahole video, which he said was rejected. Eventually, I made a donation somewhere other than what I was going to do first.
[11] What I bought for my money
[12] Cattrix developers explained that there was no back advertisement. #
[13] In fact, the Cattrix video description column has a download link along with other game ads.
[14] Created on August 4, 2020, around 6:00 PM
[15] I also announced my situation.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:06, 4 August 2020
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\|\|<table alarm=center>wwidth=100%> [youtube (8Bdv2pHoFWQ)] \|\|		\|\|<table alarm=center>wwidth=100%> [youtube (8Bdv2pHoFWQ)] \|\|

	A controversial case in which YouTubers [Cham PD] raised on a live broadcast turned out to be true.		A controversial case in which YouTubers [[Cham PD]] raised on a live broadcast turned out to be true.

	Advertisements using YouTube, Instagram, etc. must be recorded on the video whether they are advertised or sponsored in accordance with the revised [http://www.law.go.kr/ Administrative Rules/Recommendations, Guarantee, etc./Advertisement Guidelines\|Advertisement Review Guidelines] from September 1, 2020. As it is the first system to be implemented by [Fair Trade Commission], it will be a big deal if we do an "unclear commercial broadcast" called back-door advertising as it is now.		Advertisements using YouTube, Instagram, etc. must be recorded on the video whether they are advertised or sponsored in accordance with the revised [http://www.law.go.kr/ Administrative Rules/Recommendations, Guarantee, etc./Advertisement Guidelines\|Advertisement Review Guidelines] from September 1, 2020. As it is the first system to be implemented by [Fair Trade Commission], it will be a big deal if we do an "unclear commercial broadcast" called back-door advertising as it is now.
Line 12:		Line 12:
	== Details ==		== Details ==
	=== Charm PD's shooting controversy ===		=== Charm PD's shooting controversy ===
	Cham PD, who temporarily suspended his activities due to the [Han Hye-yeon] incident, is trying to sell the sandbox during a live broadcast on August 4, 2020.[[https://youtu]be/SBQE_-SLwA4s\|#]], [[Kong Hyuk-joon\|Pig boy who appeared as a liar][https://youtu].Be/UmwLT09kres\|#]""'" and so on, sparking controversy. Immediately after the remarks, Dotti appeared on the show of Cham PD himself [[http://www.topstarnews.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=824633#_enliple\| refuted with SuperChat] and later openly released his cell phone number on live, saying, "Let's talk directly over the phone." Naturally, there was no normal communication due to the phone calls from countless viewers. Cham PD's broadcast lasted until dawn and is estimated to have been watched by more than 20,000 people.		Cham PD, who temporarily suspended his activities due to the [[Han Hye-yeon]] incident, is trying to sell the sandbox during a live broadcast on August 4, 2020.[[https://youtu]be/SBQE_-SLwA4s\|#]], [[Kong Hyuk-joon\|Pig boy who appeared as a liar][https://youtu].Be/UmwLT09kres\|#]""'" and so on, sparking controversy. Immediately after the remarks, Dotti appeared on the show of Cham PD himself [[http://www.topstarnews.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=824633#_enliple\| refuted with SuperChat] and later openly released his cell phone number on live, saying, "Let's talk directly over the phone." Naturally, there was no normal communication due to the phone calls from countless viewers. Cham PD's broadcast lasted until dawn and is estimated to have been watched by more than 20,000 people.

	=== About disparaging other YouTubers ===		=== About disparaging other YouTubers ===
	When viewers opposed the idea that he was a pig who appeared in a lie, he continued to make incoherent remarks, saying he didn't even know who [Kong Hyuk-joon] was, and when he found out that there was evidence, he did so when he saw a fake man. At the request of the viewers, I turned on the evidence video myself, but whenever a problematic word came out in a controversial remark, I suddenly said something else, so I couldn't hear it, and I didn't try to read that part while I was reading along, so I intentionally refused to comment on the issue. At first, he said he did not know Gong Hyuk-joon, but changed his words, saying, "I did not know him well and criticize him, but I spoke from the perspective of the viewers based on the attitude I showed to my favorite Kim Gye-ran." Since then, he seemed to admit his mistake, saying, "If you have said anything wrong other than this, please tell me," but about half an hour later, he again made absurd remarks, saying, "I have never criticized the performer," and "I don't remember," which angered viewers.		When viewers opposed the idea that he was a pig who appeared in a lie, he continued to make incoherent remarks, saying he didn't even know who [[Kong Hyuk-joon]] was, and when he found out that there was evidence, he did so when he saw a fake man. At the request of the viewers, I turned on the evidence video myself, but whenever a problematic word came out in a controversial remark, I suddenly said something else, so I couldn't hear it, and I didn't try to read that part while I was reading along, so I intentionally refused to comment on the issue. At first, he said he did not know Gong Hyuk-joon, but changed his words, saying, "I did not know him well and criticize him, but I spoke from the perspective of the viewers based on the attitude I showed to my favorite Kim Gye-ran." Since then, he seemed to admit his mistake, saying, "If you have said anything wrong other than this, please tell me," but about half an hour later, he again made absurd remarks, saying, "I have never criticized the performer," and "I don't remember," which angered viewers.

	When asked why he shot [Dottie], he said, "I think it's deceiving me to sponsor 100,000 won," and when viewers asked, "Why did you criticize me before then?" he declined to answer, saying, "There are many people attacking me."		When asked why he shot [[Dottie]], he said, "I think it's deceiving me to sponsor 100,000 won," and when viewers asked, "Why did you criticize me before then?" he declined to answer, saying, "There are many people attacking me."

	Since then, he has made remarks such as "I don't remember" and "Did I shoot them or criticize them?" since 3:55 a.m.		Since then, he has made remarks such as "I don't remember" and "Did I shoot them or criticize them?" since 3:55 a.m.

	Shooting in the back advertisement		Shooting in the back advertisement
	Referring to [Sang Yun-tsu], [Kim Na-reum], [Tzu-yang], [Hamji] and [Moon Bok-hee], and so on, it ends as soon as I open my mouth. Referring to companies such as [Sandbox Network], [Treasure Hunter] and [MCN] etc., all of these companies are paid advertisements behind their backs, and once they speak, all of Kim's new agency is actually [Paper Company, etc. In fact, controversy began in the beginning over the disparaging of Gong Hyuk-joon rather than the disparaging of Dotti, but the incident grew bigger as Dotti appeared after he ignored the manager's request to find out what he did wrong by watching the recording, but continued to explain it.		Referring to [[Sang Yun-tsu]], [[Kim Na-reum]], [[Tzu-yang]], [[Hamji]] and [[Moon Bok-hee]], and so on, it ends as soon as I open my mouth. Referring to companies such as [[Sandbox Network]], [[Treasure Hunter]] and [[MCN]] etc., all of these companies are paid advertisements behind their backs, and once they speak, all of Kim's new agency is actually [Paper Company, etc. In fact, controversy began in the beginning over the disparaging of Gong Hyuk-joon rather than the disparaging of Dotti, but the incident grew bigger as Dotti appeared after he ignored the manager's request to find out what he did wrong by watching the recording, but continued to explain it.

	On the live broadcast, Cham PD continued to claim that the Korean [YouTube] edition was very dirty, while explaining that YouTubers (in fact, most of them [Korea] with 1 million to 4 million subscribers) could not avoid the charges and that they knew how much they had deceived viewers and subscribers, all of which were based on [fact]. However, all of these claims were made by a man who was drunk and forgot his words a few minutes ago. Therefore, it is doubtful whether this statement is true.		On the live broadcast, Cham PD continued to claim that the Korean [YouTube] edition was very dirty, while explaining that YouTubers (in fact, most of them [Korea] with 1 million to 4 million subscribers) could not avoid the charges and that they knew how much they had deceived viewers and subscribers, all of which were based on [fact]. However, all of these claims were made by a man who was drunk and forgot his words a few minutes ago. Therefore, it is doubtful whether this statement is true.
Line 29:		Line 29:
	After the shooting, the manager said that it was difficult to communicate properly. He has since written [https://www.youtube.com/post/UgzKHHnZ4C5Umq9JJ4p4AaABCQ\|a lengthy apology] in his community. However, the response from the comments is very cold. Not only is the sincerity of the apology, but it also shows that Gong Hyuk-joon, who suffered direct damage, is just a specific person and avoids mentioning him as much as possible by dismissing his behavior as a drunken mistake.		After the shooting, the manager said that it was difficult to communicate properly. He has since written [https://www.youtube.com/post/UgzKHHnZ4C5Umq9JJ4p4AaABCQ\|a lengthy apology] in his community. However, the response from the comments is very cold. Not only is the sincerity of the apology, but it also shows that Gong Hyuk-joon, who suffered direct damage, is just a specific person and avoids mentioning him as much as possible by dismissing his behavior as a drunken mistake.

	There is no further comment on the statement, "[Dottie] is trying to sell [Sandbox Network]." The apology alone says Dottie seems to have shot a superchat to stop the back ad YouTuber from mentioning it, but in fact, Cham PD is trying to sell a sandbox, which Dotti is only refuting as a superchat.		There is no further comment on the statement, "[[Dottie]] is trying to sell [[Sandbox Network]]." The apology alone says Dottie seems to have shot a superchat to stop the back ad YouTuber from mentioning it, but in fact, Cham PD is trying to sell a sandbox, which Dotti is only refuting as a superchat.

	When it comes to erasing the replay video, which he boasted never to delete, he said it was just a mistake, which is also somewhat questionable. At least if it was a real mistake, it should be explained through what process it went through. However, it is said that they have sent a request for restoration to YouTube to restore it. Along with these ambiguous attitudes, as I have reminded you, there have been many responses from all the communities that the Korean YouTuber's board seems completely unreliable, such as saying that the Korean YouTuber's board is dirty and mentioning an unspecified number of them, but in less than a day, [Tzu Yang] and [Moon Bok-hee] apologize for failing. But apart from this, there is a steady stream of talk about [Dottie] and [Kong Hyuk-joon] being sarcastic[https://m.fmkorea.com/best/3019971148\|a broadcasting attitude].		When it comes to erasing the replay video, which he boasted never to delete, he said it was just a mistake, which is also somewhat questionable. At least if it was a real mistake, it should be explained through what process it went through. However, it is said that they have sent a request for restoration to YouTube to restore it. Along with these ambiguous attitudes, as I have reminded you, there have been many responses from all the communities that the Korean YouTuber's board seems completely unreliable, such as saying that the Korean YouTuber's board is dirty and mentioning an unspecified number of them, but in less than a day, [Tzu Yang] and [Moon Bok-hee] apologize for failing. But apart from this, there is a steady stream of talk about [Dottie] and [Kong Hyuk-joon] being sarcastic[https://m.fmkorea.com/best/3019971148\|a broadcasting attitude].